Blocking ads and trackers using HOSTS

If you’ve stumbled across this post, you’re probably familiar with adblocking extensions such as Adblock and uBlock(seriously recommend the latter for a handful of reasons) and most likely you’re in need of a solution to take back your network and system resources as well as a need for less clutter and more privacy in your daily web ventures, however, this method for blocking ads at the browser level only tends to be quite inefficient and fairly limited. Wouldn’t it be cool to also have ads and trackers blocked at the system level, including but not limited to applications like Skype, uTorrent, IE(seriously?) and other browsers or the many shareware/freeware apps that track your usage via mechanisms like Google Analytics(some use exactly that for tracking).

The solution is fairly simple, we’re going to use a simple hostname based block list to map undesirable domain names to either or In my testing on OS X, I found that works best, that might not be the case on different operating systems. The blocking is done via the ages old hosts(5) unix file, but still very useful mechanism for easy static ip-name mappings at the host level.

The current block list that I use is hosted at I’m not affiliated with that site and don’t know who is providing it, that being said I use git to track and review changes between updates. The list is quite exhaustive, combining lists from several other sources cited in the header. I’d like to see a couple more lists combined like that from several other places(mainly the ones from uBlock would be useful), but you can then add extra lists by modifying the script fairly easily.

Now the script itself, is hosted on Github. Please read the entire script and what I’ve written bellow before running the script on your system.

Before you go on and use the script on your OS X, I really encourage to start using git in your /etc/ directory. The script won’t even work without a git repo in /etc/, unless you know what you’re doing and you’re going to modify it to bypass that. Having a git repo in your etc directory gives you revisioning, rollback, beta-testing, review and scrutiny abilities to whatever you’re doing to your etc. I do this on my workstations, laptops and servers that I manage. The added git overhead on your daily etc routines is insignificant when compared to the benefits you get when you most need them.

The script is smart enough to not break your current system. What it does as part of the first time run initialization is copy your current /etc/hosts to /etc/hosts.d/hosts.1.head. All your existing localhost rules and custom rules will be maintained there. The adblocking rules will go into /etc/hosts.d/hosts.3.adblock. You can add custom mapping rules(for staging servers, local network mappings) to  hosts.2.custom.

Then each time the script updates it will do the following:

  1. Update hosts.3.adblock with the latest rules from upstream;
  2. Concatenate the rules in /etc/hosts.d in the numeric order to your /etc/hosts;
  3. Show you a git diff of the changes and the option to commit those changes or deny to review, undo or commit yourself using git;

The script also has some pfsense blocking rules from and some custom ip blocking enabled in /etc/pf.rules/ This is disabled by default, you can enable it by setting the PFSENSE var to “true” or passing -f as argument. If you know of some other worthy and fresh ad/malware ip lists let me know.

Although my script is OS X only, it’s fairly easy to port it to any other UNIX system(I welcome patches to the main script via Github), having such a solution for the Windows platform would be cool too. Maybe someone reading this can weigh in with their solution or insight? Would it work fair enough, is cygwin the only way for automating this? Nonetheless, stay tuned, since I have a similar router solution(AsusWRT, DD-WRT) coming up soon, that steps up the game a notch and provides blocking for your entire network, though it surely doesn’t deprecate this host level solution (on a laptop for e.g. that is frequently switching networks).

Pros for this setup:

  1. Easy setup and update (when compared to a firewall or a custom dns);
  2. Cross-platform and cross-application solution;
  3. Faster and less intrusive(also no https mitm) than proxy solutions(such as Privoxy);
  4. Easy to temporarily disable: just cp /etc/hosts.d/hosts.1.head /etc/hosts and to restore git checkout /etc/hosts;


  1. On some operating systems hosts files with tens of thousands of rules might slow name resolution up to a certain degree. In my usage with over 50000 rules, OS X and Linux is quite fine in that regard. If you find that such is your case, maybe using a dns server or firewall rules is better for you;
  2. Some blank spaces, containers, divs or unresolved error messages will take the place of the ads themselves in sites and apps that don’t handle failure very well. You can get rid of the browser related blanks at least by using uBlock extension with just the cosmetic rules enabled(in the extension Settings);
  3. Related to the previous one, you might experience some failures in certain web related functionality(fairly limited though). Most of them will be social related or news sites that use ad nag pages before they redirect you to the article content itself. Personally I don’t care about them and as soon as I hit such a road block I close it and move on. The benefit of more resources and network bandwidth for my system as well as the increased privacy and less clutter in general, totally trumps any minor drawback like this;
  4. The script relies on the links(1)(or elinks) tool to parse the html page at and extract only the text. On OS X I use homebrew to install additional tools that I need. If you have a better solid solution that relies only on coreutils or other commonly installed shell utilities let me know;



Tagged with:

The “gravy sucking pig dog” in BSD

There’s been a while since BSD systems have this easter egg in the shutdown command source, “Die you gravy sucking pig dog” embedded into the name of the function the performs the actual halt or reboot.

FreeBSD has it(line 96):

void die_you_gravy_sucking_pig_dog(void);

OpenBSD has it(line 93):

void __dead die_you_gravy_sucking_pig_dog(void);

NetBSD has it(line 100):

static void die_you_gravy_sucking_pig_dog(void) __dead;

Even Apple has it too, but they #ifdef-ed it to another name since they don’t condone that kind of shit:

#ifdef __APPLE__
void log_and_exec_reboot_or_halt(void);
void die_you_gravy_sucking_pig_dog(void);

This kind of source code profanity is really common in the open source world ,thus no news here. 🙂

I wonder for how long has this gravy sucking pig dog been wondering the BSD sources, maybe it can be traced back to Berkley BSD? If you happen to know, please feel free to share with us in a comment to this post.

Oh, almost forgot, and Linux is not better, for eg. here is a graph of a small selection of swear words in the Linux kernel or if you wan’t to see a more entertaining piece, then grab a bag of popcorn and read through file:///Sebastian/Droge/please/choke/on/a/bucket/of/cocks(that’s an http url ofc) bug on Debian. Enjoy.

Tagged with:

Hackers: Wizards of the Electronic Age

Hackers: Wizards of the Electronic Age is a short historic documentary about the early days of hardware and software hacking as well as the huge industry(ies) that was about to explode. The documentary dates from around 1985, well before the internet took shape and the web didn’t even exist, not to mention that opportunity to see the likes of Steve Wozniak and Richard Stallman in their youth and in action baby! Take 30 minutes and watch it, it’s worth every minute:

Tagged with:

NeXTSTEP Release 3 demo by Steve Jobs

I just stumbled on this NeXTSTEP 3 demo presented by Steve Jobs himself and i must admit, i was purely shocked about what NeXTSTEP was capable of in 92! YES, 1992, NeXTSTEP 3 was released in September 8, 1992, and this video is demoing the release in advance. Interface Builder(designer as we call them today), the fluidity, responsiveness and usability of the GUI, the database backends, the image and 3d rendering, not to mention network interoperability, all of these on the humble hardware platforms that were available at that time, i think that was pure magic and way head of its time. Some the features presented there aren’t even available in todays(2011) Operating Systems and Platforms. In 1992 Microsoft was releasing Windows 3.1, Linux was just born a year earlier(still a baby) and Apple had the Macintosh OS. Nothing could compare with NeXTSTEP. Watch it, it’s worth it and inspiring, not to mention the subtle jokes Steve is making at the competition, including Apple. That’s probably the first time i’ve seen Jobs talk against Apple and its products. 🙂

Tagged with:

Apple asked Google not to use multi-touch in Android

One of the bigger complaints about T-Mobile’s G1, the first phone based on Google’s Android platform, is that its touch screen doesn’t use multi-touch, the technology which allows for a screen to accept multiple points of contact as simultaneous input. Now we may know why.

Apple, which of course makes the signature multi-touch mobile device, the iPhone, apparently asked Google not to implement it, and Google agreed, an Android team member tells us.


Looks like Steve’s karma works even with Google.

Tagged with:

EFF fights for mobile handsets freedom!


Did you jailbreak your IPhone or IPod Touch? Why would you want to do such a bad thing and violate Apple’s EULA and warranty? Well we must admit that there are a dozen of practical reasons why you should do that as well as the simple idea that it sucks to have such kind of locks and restrictions on mobile devices, especially if you pay for it!

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is pressing lawmakers to amend the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to provide protection for users who wish to change built-in carrier settings or software locks on their phones.

Tagged with: